fluorescent light the debate over the incandescent light bulb - selfgrowth.com

In 2007, Congress passed an energy bill requiring bulb manufacturers to improve the efficiency of their products.The bill is part of a broad federal movement that encourages Americans to use resources more wisely, especially energy.While most people think the intent behind this initiative is good, some lawmakers believe that the approach behind Bill 2007 has mistakenly prevented consumers from buying traditional, cheap incandescent lamps.The Republican League who, led by Texas Representative Joe Barton, argued that the law endangers personal freedom and that the federal government must be aware of the ideological impact of its actions on the Constitution.The so-The button bill is currently circulating in the house, and its supporters point out that alternatives such as CFL and LED bulbs are much more expensive than conventional incandescent lamps, and some even pose a health risk to mercury content.Democrats assert that despite the increased cost of fluorescent bulbs and LED bulbs, consumers will save money because the efficiency of these bulbs will be counted in the immediate savings of energy bills, not to mention the overall life of the light source compared to conventional incandescent lamps.In addition, opponents of the Barton Act believe that the concentration of mercury in compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) is small, and technological advances make any perceived health threats negligible.The Obama administration formally opposes the bill because it will repeal measures to encourage technological innovation, increase jobs and reduce emissions.If Bill 2007 remains the same, 100-After January 1, 2012, most suppliers will no longer provide watt bulbs.75-watt, 60-watt and 40-watt bulbs will follow suit in the next three years following the threshold of January 1.For the sake of comparison-60-Watt incandescent lamps (one of the most popular) can be used with 13-Watt compact fluorescent bulb (CFL) or 4-LED bulb.In addition to saving the impressive wattage of 47 W and 56 W respectively, most CFL bulbs save 10,000 W.Hours of life, compared to only 1,000-The life of incandescent lamps.In addition, the LED bulb has an amazing 50,000-Hours of life, which means it will be 50 times longer than a traditional incandescent lamp!While the up-The cost of the front is obviously longer than the incandescent lamp.From the energy consumed by the bulb and the relatively long life span, long-term investment is certainly worth it.With the increasing technology and demand, the types of CFL and LED bulbs produced become more diversified, offering consumers more choices at a lower price.With the government's push, the price of these advanced lighting technologies will soon reach market parity, as its cost will be the same as that of traditionally inefficient incandescent lamps.It sounds like a good idea to me!One-Stop Green looking forward to the future of "green", share with you the latest and greatest ideas of green life and green technology through blogs written by our employees."Green" is no longer an option, it is our responsibility, and that is why it is so important to try to do something small that will help change the outlook of the Earth --This is basically a one-stop green purpose.We believe that even small things like recycling or using less water will help the environment to a large extent, this is why our various solutions seek to nurture and nurture your family or business in an ecological environmentFriendly attitude.